"RUST IN PEACE . .
WHY?" _________________ Shawn Welch |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sacred battlefields are often seen as "Shrines"....not to be disturbed, but rather, to slowly decompose where they lay, in like fashion as their fallen combatants. In the case of Corregidor and her sister islands, this is often the approach taken by historians, professional and amateur alike. The statement "rust in peace" is often most closely associated with the guns and carriages themselves. It takes on a reverent meaning. It ushers in a serene mindset, quietly sitting in the jungle, rusting peacefully as the body of a combatant would similarly decay. While on the surface this appears to be appropriate, more compelling thought can lead us down another road. It has been said that "funerals are not for the dead, but are rather a therapy for the living". So with people goes the things associated with people. Given this point of logic as a starting point, we should consider Corregidor and it's myriad of unique and otherwise long gone weaponry.
Most of the weapons within what makes up the Harbor Defenses of Manila and Subic Bay are now "one of a kind". At no other point on the globe is there such a collection of American seacoast defense material as these in existence. Most of this material was long ago scrapped, victims of Army modernization and the inexorable march of systems obsolescence. Corregidor alone, with over eight 12-inch rifles, four 12-inch mortars, pieces of another eight, and a myriad of smaller weapons ranging from 3-inch to 10-inch, represents the greatest concentration of American Seacoast defense armament existing anywhere on the globe. The fact that it is also the one major harbor defense installation of the American Army that saw significant 20th century combat makes it just that much more significant.
This brings us to the point at hand - preservation. The subject of seacoast
defense has a growing number of interested researchers, many of which are
studying not only the soldiers who manned the defenses, but the equipment used
in that defense as well. Given the size of the defenses and myriad of uses and
changes over the 40 plus year active life of this former US Army Installation,
there is much still to be learned, researched and confirmed or denied. Often,
that story can be completed by researching the equipment itself...taking
measurements, recording and verifying markings and inscriptions, and in general
validating and revalidating what is known or yet to be learned about a given
piece of equipment and its relationship to an event or point in time.
Just as "funerals are therapy for the living", so to are the remains of the equipment used by our soldiers. They provide a tangible marker of what they did, what they used, and its place and context in history. If left alone to "rust peacefully in the jungle"....these great mammoths of defensive weaponry loose their ability to tell the story every day through the decay of components, inscriptions, and ultimately the weapon itself. If we allow them to "rust in peace", sooner or later, there will be nothing for our follow-on generations to view, marvel at, touch and understand. It will be as if a "connection to our past" will have been broken. This is the greatest tragedy of "rust in peace"....future generations will no longer be able to "touch" the tangible assets of our past. From a technical perspective, rust is an insidious destroyer of ferrous metals. For the big guns of Corregidor, this realization carries ominous implications. First, the rusting process proceeds almost with an exponential speed. The more advanced the rusting becomes, the greater the damage done to the item, and ultimately it will result in structural failure. Just because the small parts are gone doesn't mean rust still does not threaten these large weapons and their larger parts. A good example of what can happen is demonstrated at Ft. Hughes with the wire wound 14-inch rifles. The outer casings of the tubes are splitting because the wire windings underneath are rusting. Rusting causes metals to expand. For wire wound tubes, the wire can rust quickly and ultimately split the outer casings. For layered items, such as the hopes of built up gun tubes, this expansion can ultimately split the tubes - though at a much slower rate than for wire wound tubes. The end result however is the same. Rusting will eventually bust up these great rifles into smaller pieces...doing over time what a scrapers torch can do in minutes. Given that Corregidor's major caliber guns are mostly built up 12-inch rifles, it is important to note they are subject to rust which if allowed to get in between the hoops can eventually cause the jackets to split or break. Some of the earlier M1895 12-inch gun tubes have a two part "A" hope. Here rust can literally cause a section of the barrel to "break off", which clearly would be tragic for future generations. More damaging to the researcher, rust obliterates markings such as place of manufacture, serial number, nomenclature, etc. A good example of just such a tragedy, the 8-inch gun tube down near the hotel/dock area can no longer be identified because the rust has obliterated the markings. Given the clear and irreversible damage that rust does cause, and assuming the premise of a mandate for preservation is accepted, the next question is how we execute this preservation mission. Many people are offended by the Corregidor Foundation's "painted guns". Given the general "shattered" nature of the entire infrastructure of Corregidor, a major caliber gun, freshly painted Olive Drab, is clearly a stark inconsistency. There are other problems with this besides the appearance of OD paint. Unless the paint is a very high quality, gloss enamel paint, the chances of adequately arresting the rusting process and preventing further rust is very low. Assuming that rust has been mostly removed from the surface of the metal, a high quality gloss enamel tends to seal the surface well and repel water for a fairly long period of time. Flat OD paints, unlike gloss enamels, are generally porous and as such are most ineffective rust preventers. Given the almost certain fact that these weapons were painted without any surface rust preventive treatment (this is not known for certain by the author), the effective rust preventative life of the flat OD paint is reduced even further. Clearly, if applied sloppily and with no surface preparation, painting is ultimately a fools errand. One thing that does appear true is that "color does matter". While it is true these weapons when in service were often painted OD, they were also at times painted in camouflaged patterns as well as gloss black. Clearly, gloss black is less of an "eye sore" than flat or even gloss OD in a generally "shattered" and clearly not "serviceable" environment. From the perspective of "black", we can consider an appropriate approach to preservation for these majestic weapons. There are many companies that produce products that are technically "rust converters". These are organic compounds that interact with the rust, and with copolymers convert the rust to a non-penetratable seal over the metal itself. This is where the "black" pigment becomes advantageous. Not only do rust converters halt existing rust, they seal the metal and through the reaction between the compounds and the metal, produce a dark black, almost "air tight" surface that is almost a "gloss black". This then provides an outstanding primer base for a further coat of gloss black enamel paint, or it alone can serve as the "protecting coating". The best part about the rust converters is that they do not require a major surface preparation treatment for application. A simple hot water washing (portable water steam cleaner) and then removal of scale/flake rust (wire brushes work fine for this) is all that is required to prepare the surface for application. One of the best rust converters
on the market is available from
CESCO (Carolina
Equipment & Supply Company, Inc.), located in North Charleston, South Carolina,
USA. They provide industrial equipment and machinery to industry specializing in
abrasive blast and paint spray equipment, blasting media, safety equipment and
supplies, air compressors, hydraulic hose and fittings, generators, and pressure
washers.
In 2000, this author's son executed an Eagle Scout project consisting of restoring the USMC's 7-inch field gun at the USMC Museum, Quantico, VA. (See photo at right, and below) Though this required over 500 hours of volunteer labor, the application of Cesco's Rust Converter "RustCure H100" proved to be very effective as both a converter of rust and primer for high quality paints. The easiest way for the Corregidor Foundation to approach preservation is to use hand wire brushes and a portable steam cleaner to prepare a selected weapon for treatment, and then early in the morning (when the surface of the weapon is at its coolest), apply the rust converter. It is important to remember that this treatment dries fast, and can not be applied to surfaces that are higher in temperature of about 95 degrees. Of course, there are directions on the container. These instructions are designed as an aid to assist the foundation in application of the compound to be used in consonance with the instructions on the "rust converter" product. Preservation of the concrete portion of this fortress will be the subject of another discussion. The most dangerous aspect of this is the rusting of the reinforcing steel inside the concrete, and therefore arresting the rusting of that reinforcing steel is the critical step. Today's advances in preservation give us this ability. Clearly, regardless of the overall "destructive condition" of Corregidor, an "act of preservation" for the weapons that remain is important to keeping tangible the memory of the many soldiers, whom for over 40 odd years maintained them, as well as those who served them in battle, alive. As minimum effort, we owe this to all the soldiers who served the great weapons of this mighty fortress.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE AUTHOR: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|